Flock ALPR surveillance

Warned the high-resolution cameras can gain new capabilities through software updates without visible change, and said residents did not get a fair chance to weigh in before the system was deployed.

Chastised the council for three months of inaction on the Flock contract and demanded they vote to terminate it, citing the Dunwoody, Georgia misuse revelation.

Called Flock cameras mass surveillance tools and warned council members they too should fear the system, urging a vote to terminate the contract.

Cited the Dayton, Ohio case where immigration enforcement made over 7,000 requests to a similar-sized Flock network, and raised data-sharing and shareholder concerns.

Raised data-center water consumption during the drought and said Flock cameras are unequally concentrated in Black neighborhoods; also questioned the R4 surveillance spending on CSB facilities.

Representing DFOC Norfolk, warned the cameras build profiles of residents' movements and offered a contact email for citizens wishing to work on camera removal.